Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3309 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1270 - 179 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |