Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2756 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1270 - 63 vs 46 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€209.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |