Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2330 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 80 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 173 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€665.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €665.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |