Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3404 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 80 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 21% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 415 vs 342 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
415
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€769.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €769.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |