Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v3 is 1369 days older than Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 1700X - 181 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
180
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €127.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |