Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 677 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 7 1700X - 151 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700X - €148.13 vs €148.73
- Up to 2% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 7 1700X - €0.98 vs €1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €148.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |