Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2430 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 112 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€430.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |