Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v2 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v2 is 162 days older than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Performs up to 1% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-4300 - 454 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
