Buy on Amazon
€29.22
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 55% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €29.22 vs €65.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Athlon 3000G - €0.07 vs €0.13 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4300 - 503 vs 443 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Serie FX-4300 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 4M 95W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349 minutes ago
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Athlon |
| Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
