Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 2102 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 24% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E3-1260L - 174 vs 140 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €128.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |