Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1260L outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1260L is 330 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Performs up to 13% better in League of Legends than FX-6200 - 59 vs 52 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 45 vs 125 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
