Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 is 569 days older than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8350 - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 80 vs 125 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |