Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1177 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 594 vs 546 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
594
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€430.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15762 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |