Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Minecraft than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 866 vs 678 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
866
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€568.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €568.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |