Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $273
Availability
MSRP in USD: $273
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v3 is 181 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1620 - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
