Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 69 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 199 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€283.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |