Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4195 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 38% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E3-1225 - 138 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 32 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€498.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €498.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |