Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 is 610 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Performs up to 1% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G1620 - 455 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 55 vs 95 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
449
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E3-1225
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
