Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 160 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |