Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3887 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 195 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 32 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€568.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €568.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |