Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 134 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1220 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
