Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |