Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v2 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v2 is 203 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1620 - 146 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 55 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
143
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
69 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |