Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E-2356G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2356G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2356G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E-2356G - 672 vs 646 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2356G - 16 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€147.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €147.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2356G | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |