Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400 is 3423 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-940 - 119 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 60% cheaper than Pentium Gold G5400 - €49.0 vs €122.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium Gold G5400 - €0.43 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
41%
Price, €
€122
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €122 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G5400 | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |