Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €49.0 vs €124.55
- Up to 48% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10600KF - €0.11 vs €0.21 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-940 - 594 vs 443 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
594
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
52%
Price, €
€124.55
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |