Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G5400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G5400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 200 days newer than the cheaper Pentium Gold G5400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - €122.0 vs €209.12
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600K - €1.03 vs €1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 58 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium Gold G5400 - 137 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
119
86%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
67%
Price, €
€209.12
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G5400 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |