Key Differences
In short — Pentium G860 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G860 is 456 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G860 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G860 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |