Buy on Amazon
€56.29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2543 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Celeron G1610 - 168 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Athlon 3000G (3.5GHz, 2Core, 5MB, 35W)
Buy for €56.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
