Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 92 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G645T - 89 vs 88 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
89
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |