Key Differences
In short — Pentium G620 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G620 is 561 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G620 - 55 vs 65 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G620 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |