Buy on Amazon
€41.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3460 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3460 is 1289 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500S.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Performs up to 3% better in Diablo IV than Core i5-2500S - 110 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500S - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500S
- Up to 19% cheaper than Pentium G3460 - €34.03 vs €41.87
- Up to 16% better value when playing Diablo IV than Pentium G3460 - €0.32 vs €0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3460 - 4 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Pentium G3460 3,5 GHz Gebrauchter Dual-Core-CPU-Prozessor 3M 53W LGA 1150
Buy for €41.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Core i5-2500S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
107
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2500S CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 6M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €34.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3460
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i5-2500S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3460 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500S |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
