Buy on Amazon
€41.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3460 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3460 is 232 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1820 - 117 vs 116 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 15% cheaper than Pentium G3460 - €35.49 vs €41.87
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G3460 - €0.31 vs €0.36 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Pentium G3460 3,5 GHz Gebrauchter Dual-Core-CPU-Prozessor 3M 53W LGA 1150
Buy for €41.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
116
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
INTEL Celeron G1820 2,7GHz LGA1150 2MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Pentium G3460
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3460 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
