Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3460.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €41.87 vs €216.77
- Up to 79% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10320 - €0.37 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G3460 - 123 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3460 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
112
91.05691056910568%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2626 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
21.022727272727273%
Price, €
€216.77
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
613
39.83105912930474%
Multi-Core
1044
22.56809338521401%
Intel Pentium G3460 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |