Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3220T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3220T is 272 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |