Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1887 days newer than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Far Cry 3 than Pentium 3825U - 152 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 20 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€270.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €270.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 925 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |