Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2991 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 47% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core M-5Y51 - 269 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 32 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
269
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€569.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €569.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core M | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
4 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |