Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 248 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 4 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core M-5Y51 - 102 vs 95 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €86.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core M | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |