Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-6300 - 154 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €119.82 vs €430.01
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-9900KF - €0.8 vs €2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.79/FPS
28%
Price, €
€430.01
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €119.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |