Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2349 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 266 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 17 vs 95 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 17 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |