Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 717 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 17 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 0% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 225 vs 224 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |