Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2364 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Core i5-3450 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - €18.53 vs €74.91
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-3450 - €0.12 vs €0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 77 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €18.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Buy for €74.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |