Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1969 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1820 - 116 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
30.477963997517072%
Multi-Core
825
11.451971127151582%
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |