Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i3-6100 - 289 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €68.52 vs €512.18
- Up to 86% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900KF - €0.25 vs €1.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
14.124293785310735%
Price, €
€512.18
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €512.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58237 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
271
93.77162629757785%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
38.41698841698842%
Multi-Core
2336
11.10160631118715%
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |