Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 29% better in Minecraft than Core i5-10400F - 916 vs 710 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €100.05 vs €586.31
- Up to 78% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-14900K - €0.14 vs €0.64 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
916
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
21%
Price, €
€586.31
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €586.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6329 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
710
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6330 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |