Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €91.6 vs €579.7
- Up to 83% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €0.86 vs €5.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10400F - 113 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14417 minutes ago
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14416 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |