Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-13700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than Core i7-13700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-13700T - 593 vs 510 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700T - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i7-13700T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
