Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen 7 8840HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 33 days newer than Ryzen 7 8840HS.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 8840HS - 164 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Single-Core
2476
81.98675496688742%
Multi-Core
10570
57.8544061302682%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 28 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
