Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1828 days newer than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 3700U - 232 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 15 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
