Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1745 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 26% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G4900 - 197 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €60.24 vs €689.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-13900KS - €0.39 vs €3.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 54 vs 150 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |